As a reporter for Sum of Change, I am always the one behind the camera speaking with grassroots activists about issues that matter deeply to them. Yesterday, the roles were flipped when I was called in for my first television appearance by RT America. They wanted to talk about President Obama and why he is not demonstrating more leadership when it comes to the labor protests spreading across the country. In the days before this, I had traveled to Ohio to cover the events there. Folks at RT had seen our coverage and wanted to chat with m
Will Urquhart, a managing partner at Sum of Change Productions was surprised and disappointed not to see President Obama at the protests speaking clearly on the union issue.
There is growing anger directed at Obama and the Democratic leadership in general he said.
“I can understand there is a tendency in Washington not to get involved into local issues – it’s justifiable. However, I think it’s impossible just to claim this is still a local issue. There is a nation-wide assault on the Union State taking place,” he remarked.
There is a year ahead of the forthcoming 2012 presidential elections, and Obama still has great approval ratings. But no one knows how the bill, if taken, may change the situation.
“Right now there is a serious moment in American history taking place and we are seeing Unions being attacked all across the country. I am not thinking of 2012 right now, I ‘d like to see him stand up for this issue right now,” Urquhart said.
COLUMBUS, OH: I am on the ground in Ohio, here to cover the protests for the couple days that I can afford to be away from DC. Today, despite a persistent rain, demonstrators lined the sidewalk outside of the Capitol Building in Columbus to voice their opposition to Senate Bill 5 which threatens state employees' bargaining rights. Today's protest was a lead up to tomorrow, when thousands are expected to descend on Columbus.
I also want to include the full interview I did with one of the teachers:
Some helpful facts about Ohio and collective bargaining (from the Examiner, not directly quoted)
• Ohio public employees make the same or less than their counterparts in the private sector (although a higher percentage of state workers have college degrees)
• In the last 9 years, state workers have taken 5 years of pay freezes (that's with collective bargaining)
• Budget gaps are higher, on average, in states that do not allow collective bargaining
• State employee payroll in Ohio equals only 9% of the state budget
We'll be here for part of the protest tomorrow too!
Last week, we attended a candidate forum for candidates in the special election for Washington, DC's At-Large City Council. We were hosted by DC for Democracy, Greater Greater Washington, and the DC Environmental Network. This event was streamed live and you can watch the entire recording of that livefeed here. Below, you will find videos broken out by question. We have posted every question that was asked, in the order it was asked. Enjoy!
I was honored today to join folks from DC for Democracy, the local Democracy for America affiliate, to personally deliver over 23,000 thank you notes to Senator Russ Feingold. Shortly after the the 2010 election, Jim Dean asked DFA members from all across the country to send the Senator messages of appreciation. In an email to all members, he wrote:
We lost a lot of bold leaders on Tuesday, but Senator Russ Feingold is in a class all his own.
He is one of the great heroes of the progressive movement -- standing up and fighting for the people of his state and Americans across the country time and again -- often when no one else had the courage to lead.
When other Democrats in Washington capitulated to President Bush and supported the war in Iraq, Senator Feingold stood up and voted against war. Two years later, he became the first Senator to call a withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
When the Bush administration pushed the Patriot Act on Congress, Senator Feingold was the only person is the Senate to recognize the bill as an attack on American civil liberties and vote "No."
And when unlimited and unregulated "soft money" threatened to overwhelm our political system, Senator Feingold authored and passed into law the most powerful campaign finance reform in history.
Senator Feingold has always been there for us. Please, join me in writing Senator Feingold a short thank you message for all the work he's done for us over the years.
We met up at Senator Feingold's campaign office, a short walk from Union Station, and waited patiently for the Senator to get back from voting on the START Treaty. The staff asked me not to film the meeting so they could have a casual conversation, but I did get the opportunity to catch the DC4D folks at Senator Feingold's office getting their first look at the tens of thousands of thank you messages:
In our meeting, the Senator told us he is looking forward to the coming fights and while his role will change we should expect him to continue to lead on any number of issues.
Thank you, Senator, for your years of service, courage, and integrity. To everyone who wrote a thank you message, I wish you could have seen the look on his face when we presented them to him. Know that he appreciates it.
Grover Norquist, leader of the conservative Americans for Tax Reform, suggested a high-stakes approach to tackling the issue of federal spending Thursday, saying that the GOP must be willing to go as far as to shut down the government in their pursuit of debt and deficit reduction.
Of everything Mr. Norquist said, nothing was as insightful as this comment:
"There's now a Fox television network. There's now the Internet, in a way there wasn't back then. So ... when Bill Clinton vetoed the budget and closed the government, saying the Republicans had closed the government, ... [that] is not something you could sell again," Norquist told Politico.
Furthermore, Norquist claimed, the new Republican leadership would be better at messaging the action.
"It was able to be sold the first time because everybody thought Gingrich was running the entire country because of the way the coverage [of him] had gone and because Gingrich acted as if he was running the country. Boehner's not going to do that," Norquist said. Politico's full story has more.
He is completely right about two things:
1) When President Clinton battled with the GOP over the budget, it was widely believed that Republicans were to blame for a full shutdown of the government. In the end, it damaged the GOP reputation and seemingly gave President Clinton a boost of political capitol that had lingering effects on everything else he tried to do. But the Official Republican Communications Department, you know, Fox News, was not available to blame President Clinton 24-7 for the shutdown.
2) There was a common wisdom that Gingrich was in charge. Both the sensationalism of the coverage surrounding the '94 elections and Republican chest-thumping over the mandate given to them from the voters led to that belief. The absence of Fox News was not the sole contributor to the backlash over the GOP's government shutdown maneuvering.
Coming back to present day politics, we find similarities and differences. The most obvious difference: Fox News. We can rest assured that, should a shutdown occur, they will "objectively" and with total "fairness" come to the conclusion that President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Democrats in Congress are solely responsible.
Less obvious is whether or not the GOP leadership can pull off an it's-my-way-or-I'm-taking-my-ball-and-going-home approach while simultaneously shirking any responsibility for the resulting shutdown. It will not be easy to argue "You are totally in charge, but if you don't do what I want I'm going to put a stop to this whole thing." That is a very fine line to walk.